Statute of Limitations and “Foreign Object” Rule

The statute of limitations in a New York medical malpractice lawsuit typically begins to run on the date that the mistake or malpractice is committed. There are few exceptions to this rule. One exception, the “foreign object rule,” tolls the statute of limitations for filing a medical practice lawsuit where a foreign object is negligently left inside a patient after a surgical procedure. “Tolling” the statute of limitations means pausing or delaying the deadline for filing a lawsuit. The statute of limitations is tolled because the patient may not even know that an object has been left inside him or her. The patient must sue within one year of discovering the foreign object.

It’s a good idea to consult a New York medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible so that you can avoid a statute of limitations defense.

A “foreign object” has been defined as something that doctors never intended to leave inside a patient, such as a sponge or a needle. A foreign object is not something that doctors intended to remain in the patient’s body, even just temporarily.

Fixation devices” are items placed in the patient with the intention that they serve a continuing medical purpose, such as a catheter, pacemaker or an artificial knee. If a fixation device malfunctions the statute of limitations is not tolled.

Because it is often unclear whether the statute of limitations will be tolled or not, it is best to contact a New York medical malpractice as soon as you suspect you may have a medical malpractice case.

Broken Catheter Case

In one case, doctors intentionally left a catheter in a patient’s heart and removed it a few days later. However, when they removed the catheter, a piece broke off and remained in the plaintiff’s heart. Since the catheter was originally intended to remain, the broken piece could not be considered a “foreign object.” Accordingly, the statute of limitations was not tolled during the years that the catheter piece was in the patient without him knowing. The judge made this ruling even though he held that there was no question that the catheter piece was not left intentionally and did not serve a continuing medical purpose.

If you have been injured by medical malpractice, call Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C. at (212) 385-4410 to schedule a free consultation with a New York medical malpractice attorney.

Recent Posts

One Person Killed in Vestal Police Shooting on Sequoia Lane

Investigation Underway After Police Shoot and Kill Man During Mental Health Crisis VESTAL, NEW YORK…

2 days ago

Cyclist Died in Borough Park Dump Truck Accident

53-Year-Old Died in Borough Park, Brooklyn Dump Truck Collision by 16th Avenue and 49th Street…

2 days ago

Bronx Building Fire Leaves Two People Dead, 11 Injured

Investigation Underway After Building Fire in the Bronx Results in Two Fatalities, Multiple Injuries BRONX,…

2 days ago

N.T.S.B Reports Communication Failures Contributed to LaGuardia

Investigation by N.T.S.B. Reveals Communication Failures Preceded Fatal Plane Crash With Fire Truck at LaGuardia…

5 days ago

15 People Injured in Queens School Bus Crash

Six Adults, Nine Children Injured in Queens School Bus Accident on the Long Island Expressway…

5 days ago

Devonte Brown Accused of Sexually Abusing Children at The Learning Factory in Brooklyn

Day Care Teacher Devonte Brown Arrested After Being Accused of Molesting Young Girls at The…

6 days ago