COVID-19 Notice: Gersowitz Libo & Korek, PC is fully-operational during the COVID-19 global pandemic. We continue to handle cases and operate remotely, in accordance with mandated safety guidelines. We are available by phone, email or video conference to discuss your case.
Read More from Our Partners


over 900 million recovered for our clients

Helping New York and New Jersey Injury Victims for over 30 Years.


Momentous LGBTQ SCOTUS Victory Protects Against Workplace Discrimination

Momentous LGBTQ SCOTUS Victory Protects Against Workplace Discrimination

In a decision written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, in the case of Bostock v. Clayton County, GA, a majority of the United States Supreme Court has determined that LGBTQ workers are protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This historical ruling finally makes clear that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender violates federal law. Despite using the pejorative term “homosexual” throughout the decision, in all other respects the ruling is a resounding affirmation that LGBTQ individuals are to be treated with the same dignity and respect as other workers.

The ruling addresses three cases that made their way to the high court from various places throughout the country. When Gerald Bostock participated in a gay recreational softball league, he was terminated by Clayton County, Georgia for conduct “unbecoming” a county employee. Donald Zarda, a sky-diving instructor in New York, was terminated days after he mentioned being gay. And a Michigan funeral home fired Aimee Stephens, who began employment as a male, after she informed her employer that she planned to “live and work full-time as a woman.” While each of these cases began for the same reason, the different results in the lower courts left uncertain whether LGBTQ individuals could rely upon Title VII to protect them.

Termination Based on Sexual Identity Ruled Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court now addresses that uncertainty and, in so doing, thoroughly examines and rejects each employer’s justification for the challenged termination by examining the legislative history, text and plain meaning of “sex” as defined within Title VII, a sweeping federal statute first adopted by Congress in 1964 to address workplace disparities and inequities. In enacting this statute, the court noted that “Congress adopted broad language making it illegal for an employer to rely on an employee’s sex when deciding to fire an employee.” A necessary consequence of this legislative intent was that an employer who fires an individual “merely for being gay or transgender defies the law.” In other words, the Supreme Court now makes clear that a decision to fire an employee merely because of sexual identity makes a decision based upon sex in violation of Title VII.

Religious Freedom Exclusions May Still Exist

Not surprisingly, Justice Gorsuch left for another day the question as to whether an employer who invokes a religious freedom defense can evade Title VII liability. In other words, left unsettled is whether religious organizations can continue to discriminate against LGBTQ

gersowitz Libo & korek

individuals based upon a defense that a gay or transgender person flouts the exercise of religious freedom. This issue is soon to reach the high court as two pending cases present the question whether teachers who provide religious instruction are exempt from Title VII’s protections.

In dissent, Justice Alito joined by Justice Thomas, and Justice Kavanaugh writing separately, each reject the majority decision as usurping the role of Congress and what Congress intended in 1964. The dissent rejects the idea that courts should “update old statutes so that they better reflect the current values of society.” Rather, the dissent concludes Congress did not intend to outlaw discrimination because of gender identity or sexual orientation in 1964 and, thus, the majority is mistaken in interpreting Title VII to extend such protections in 2020.

While the majority decision presents any number of issues to be addressed in future litigation, there can be no doubt that today the Supreme Court has, at last, determined employers can no longer discriminate against LGBTQ individuals with impunity. A momentous victory.

Wrongfully Terminated Due to Sexual Identity?

If you were wrongfully terminated or discriminated against at work due to your sexual identity, you deserve justice. Our experienced workplace discrimination attorneys can hold the liable parties accountable for their actions and seek just compensation for your hardship. Our legal team at Gersowitz Libo & Korek, P.C. can help you get the justice you deserve.

To schedule your free consultations with our law offices today, please contact our experienced New York sexual harassment and discrimination attorneys at 1-212-385-4410.

Client Testimonials

A few years ago I was misdiagnosed and nearly ended up becoming a quadriplegic. Three spinal fusions followed. I asked my sister, a top D.C. lawyer, to find the name of the best personal injury lawyer in NYC, and I was referred to Jeff Korek of... Gersowitz Libo and Korek. It was a tough time for me, but Jeff and Irene were great and helped me through it every step of the way. They were compassionate, understanding and very accommodating, yet professional and always with their fingers on the pulse. They really care about the welfare of their clients, and not just money driven. When I was unable to travel, Jeff came to me, and I live an hour from the city. This firm is well known, well established, and has earned the respect and credibility among its peers. I highly recommend the firm of Gersowitz Libo and Korek without hesitation and, in fact, I already have. My thanks go out to the entire team for a better than expected outcome!!! They get a 5 out of 5 stars from me!!read more
Mary S.
I am giving this law firm 6 out of six thumbs up. Very professional very personal and compassionate staff. From the Attorneys to the staff they were all...
Anthony C.
Thank you to the team at Gersowitz Libo & Korek, and especially to our wonderful attorney Anthony Makarov. Mr. Makarov was our trial attorney who took our...
Amy L.
Ed Gersowitz and all his colleagues at the firm Gersowitz Libo & Korek, PC far exceeded all my expectations for a personal injury law firm. From the moment...
Robin F.
I was injured in 2011 and spent nearly 8 years with Ed Gersowitz and Jeff Korek. Their professionalism and care was beyond. The process was long and at times exhausting but Ed. Jeff and their team made me feel comfortable and in great hands. I... can't thank them enough and would highly recommend GLK to all. Thank you for all your help!read more
Jeremy N.
Thank you to the team at Gersowitz Libo & Korek and special thanks to attorney Daniel, Avi and Annette for all your help on my case. Dealing with the law...
Hazel M.
From beginning to end we were comfortable with the team at GLK. Thank you Mr. Gersowitz (Ed) for obtaining a settlement out of court.
Donna L. S.
Jeff and Michael are both very professional and helpful towards my case. I would like to thank the team and Irene, the assistant, for all their help despite the length of time that the case took. They took a lot of care and were patient with... answering any inquiries that I more
Cindy C.
They were incredibly professional and pleasant to work with. They made the personal injury process straightforward and easy to navigate. I appreciated their...
Lindsay L.
La mejor firma de abogados, muy profesionales, excelentes persona, todo el tiempo estuvieron pendientes de mi y mis necesidades, estoy muy agradecida con ellos.
Maricela O.
section start
Need Help with an Injury? We're Here to Help. Contact Us Today:
  • Disclaimer | Privacy Policy

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.